1. My friends agreed that they both understood the importance of the topic. They both said that it was evident that I took my time to read the research on the topic and conduct in-depth reviews of all studies read.
One stated that my topic was not an argument and that just stating "Why parents select private schools versus public schools" does not present an argument. One stated that the argument itself is "Why parents select private schools versus public schools" and that it was fine since the flow of my lit review examined the reasons why parents select private schools versus public schools.
I am going to follow the advice of the 2nd friend because she is an educator and saw the implications and importance of the argument on schooling today.
2. What is the general argument being made?
Is the importance of the topic understood? How?
Is there sufficient background information?
Does the format of the lit review flow seamlessly or is it choppy in parts? If choppy, where? Do you have suggestions to assist with the flow?
Were the research studies mentioned important to the topic? If not, why not?
The general argument being made is that parents select private schools over public schools for different reasons, but mainly because of factors that they consider to be important to them.
The importance of the topic is understood because of the research that provides insight into reasons parents select private school education over public school education.
There is sufficient background information, detailing the purpose of education and how it has evolved.
The format of the lit review flows seamlessly. Headings and subheadings assist with the flow.
The research studies mentioned were important to the topic because they helped in the outlining of the argument.
No comments:
Post a Comment